You will be assessed according to the following criteria:
- Explain and differentiate the greenhouse effect from global warming.
- Explain how global warming has changed the planet over the years.
- Explain how to prevent global warming while preserving the greenhouse effect.
- Quality of the final production, use of scientific language, and originality.
| Criteria | Excellent | Good | Satisfactory | Needs Improvement |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Understanding of the Greenhouse Effect and Global Warming | Clearly and accurately explains the greenhouse effect and global warming, showing a strong understanding of the differences between them. | Explains both concepts correctly, with only minor inaccuracies or missing details. | Demonstrates partial understanding of the concepts, but explanations may be confusing or incomplete. | Shows little understanding of the concepts or confuses the greenhouse effect with global warming. |
| Scientific Explanation of Climate Change | Uses scientific evidence and accurate information to explain how human activities contribute to climate change and global warming. | Uses mostly accurate scientific information with some supporting evidence. | Uses limited scientific information or includes some inaccuracies. | Provides little or no scientific explanation. |
| Consequences of Global Warming | Thoroughly explains the environmental, social, and planetary consequences of global warming, connecting ideas clearly. | Explains several consequences with adequate detail. | Mentions some consequences, but explanations are superficial or incomplete. | Provides few or incorrect consequences of global warming. |
| Solutions and Preservation of the Greenhouse Effect | Presents realistic, scientifically supported solutions to reduce global warming while preserving the natural greenhouse effect. | Presents appropriate solutions with some scientific support. | Presents limited or simplistic solutions. | Solutions are unclear, unrealistic, or scientifically incorrect. |
| Use of Scientific Language | Consistently uses clear, appropriate, and accurate scientific vocabulary throughout the work. | Uses scientific vocabulary appropriately most of the time. | Uses some scientific vocabulary, but with inconsistencies or errors. | Rarely uses scientific language or uses it incorrectly. |
| Creativity and Originality | The final product is highly creative, engaging, and original, showing excellent effort and organization. | The final product is creative and well organized. | The final product shows some creativity and organization. | The final product lacks creativity, organization, or effort. |
| Collaboration and Participation | All group members clearly contributed and participated actively in all stages of the activity. | Most group members participated appropriately. | Participation was uneven among group members. | Little evidence of collaboration or participation. |
| Quality of Final Presentation/Product | The video, podcast, or presentation is exceptionally clear, organized, visually/audibly effective, and free of major errors. | The final product is clear and organized with few errors. | The final product communicates the main ideas but may contain several errors or organizational problems. | The final product is incomplete, difficult to understand, or poorly organized. |